Loretta Burton v. Ozburn Logistic
| LORETTA BURTON |
| OZBURN HESSEY LOGISTIC |
| 15-1540 |
| March 4, 2015 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Loretta Burton v. Ozburn Logistic |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
3011998027
NOT PRECEDENTIAL PER CURIAM OPINION Coram: FISHER, KRAUSE and VAN ANTWERPEN, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 7. PS4-136. Burton's appeal is timely, and we hereby deny OHL's motion to dismiss. OHL's "Motion for Unreasonable Attorney's Fees and Costs" is hereby denied.
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Loretta Burton v. Ozburn Logistic | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: LORETTA BURTON | |
| Represented By: | Loretta Burton |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: OZBURN HESSEY LOGISTIC | |
| Represented By: | Robert John Baker |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
