USA v. Brandon Schnetzka
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: BRANDON H. SCHNETZKA
Case Number: 15-1752
Filed: March 27, 2015
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
November 18, 2015 USA v. Brandon Schnetzka

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 18, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 3012132851 NOT PRECEDENTIAL OPINION Coram: AMBRO, HARDIMAN, Authoring Judge and SLOVITER, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 6. Granting counsel's motion to withdraw.--[Edited 11/18/2015 by TMK]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: USA v. Brandon Schnetzka
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Meredith A. Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: BRANDON H. SCHNETZKA
Represented By: Frederick W. Ulrich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?