Jacqueline Veverka v. Royal Caribbean Cruise
| JACQUELINE VEVERKA |
| ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES |
| 15-1965 |
| April 21, 2015 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other Personal Injury |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Jacqueline Veverka v. Royal Caribbean Cruises |
| Jacqueline Veverka v. Royal Caribbean Cruises |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
3012293984
NOT PRECEDENTIAL OPINION Coram: AMBRO, KRAUSE, Circuit Judges and THOMPSON*, District Judge. Total Pages: 14. Judge: KRAUSE Authoring. *The Honorable Anne E. Thompson, Senior District Judge for the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, sitting by designation.
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Jacqueline Veverka v. Royal Caribbean Cruise | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: JACQUELINE VEVERKA | |
| Represented By: | Peter J. Cresci |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES | |
| Represented By: | Eric S. Medina |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
