April Hock v. Commissioner Social Security
Plaintiff - Appellant: APRIL ROSE HOCK
Defendant - Appellee: COMMISSIONER SOCIAL SECURITY
Case Number: 15-2257
Filed: May 20, 2015
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: S.S.I.D.

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
April 6, 2016 April Hock v. Commissioner Social Security

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 6, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3012254882 NOT PRECEDENTIAL OPINION Coram: MCKEE, Chief Judge, AMBRO and SCIRICA, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 7. Judge: AMBRO Authoring.--[Edited 04/06/2016 by TMK]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: April Hock v. Commissioner Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: APRIL ROSE HOCK
Represented By: Samantha Xander
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: COMMISSIONER SOCIAL SECURITY
Represented By: Charles Kawas
Represented By: Nora R. Koch
Represented By: Andrew C. Lynch
Represented By: Nicole A. Schmid
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?