Douglas Coley v. Margaret Bagley
Petitioner - Appellant: DOUGLAS L. COLEY
Respondent - Appellee: MARGARET A. BAGLEY, Warden
Case Number: 10-3469
Filed: April 19, 2010
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Death Penalty

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
February 8, 2013 Summary Coley v. Bagley

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 8, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 6111585180 OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Decision for publication. Gilbert S. Merritt, Eugene E. Siler, Jr. (AUTHORING), and Jeffrey S. Sutton, Circuit Judges.
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Douglas Coley v. Margaret Bagley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant: DOUGLAS L. COLEY
Represented By: Kevin M. Cafferkey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: MARGARET A. BAGLEY, Warden
Represented By: Robert E. Prather
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?