Pamela Thomas v. Michael Astrue
PAMELA THOMAS |
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security |
12-3354 |
October 15, 2012 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
D.I.W.C./D.I.W.W. |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Pamela Thomas v. Carolyn W. Colvin |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 702053346 Filed Nonprecedential Disposition PER CURIAM. The judgment of the district court is REVERSED, and the case is REMANDED with instructions that it be returned to the agency for further proceedings consistent with this order. Daniel A. Manion, Circuit Judge; Diane S. Sykes, Circuit Judge and John Daniel Tinder, Circuit Judge. [6507635-1] [6507635] [12-3354] |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Pamela Thomas v. Michael Astrue | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff - appellant: PAMELA THOMAS | |
Represented By: | Barry A. Schultz |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant - appellee: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security | |
Represented By: | Kurt Lindland |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.