Shannon Brown v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe R
| SHANNON BROWN |
| BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE CORPORATION |
| 13-2102 |
| May 22, 2013 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Federal Employers Liability |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Brown v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Ry. Co.
|
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
702303919
Filed opinion of the court by Judge Tinder. AFFIRMED. Ilana Diamond Rovner, Circuit Judge; Ann Claire Williams, Circuit Judge and John Daniel Tinder, Circuit Judge. [6602035-1] [6602035] [13-2102]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Shannon Brown v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe R | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: SHANNON BROWN | |
| Represented By: | George T. Brugess |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE CORPORATION | |
| Represented By: | Stephen J. Heine |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
