Robert Lodholtz v. York Risk Services Group, Inco
| ROBERT LODHOLTZ, as Assignee of Pulliam Enterprises, Inc. |
| YORK RISK SERVICES GROUP, INCORPORATED |
| 14-2571 |
| July 17, 2014 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Insurance |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Lodholtz v. York Risk Servs. Grp., Inc.
|
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
702470637
Filed opinion of the court by Judge Ripple. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. William J. Bauer, Circuit Judge; Kenneth F. Ripple, Circuit Judge and Diane S. Sykes, Circuit Judge. [6640480-1] [6640480] [14-2571]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Robert Lodholtz v. York Risk Services Group, Inco | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: ROBERT LODHOLTZ, as Assignee of Pulliam Enterprises, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Charles P. Rice |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: YORK RISK SERVICES GROUP, INCORPORATED | |
| Represented By: | Ginny L. Peterson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
