David Schlemm v. Matthew Frank, et al

David Schlemm v. Matthew Frank, et al

Plaintiff - Appellant:	DAVID A. SCHLEMM
Defendant - Appellee:	MATTHEW J. FRANK, in his individual and official capacities as Secretary of Wisconsin Department of Corrections, PHILLIP A. KINGSTON, in his individual and official capacities as Warden of Waupun Correctional Institution and EDWARD F. WALL
Case Number:	14-2604
Filed:	July 21, 2014
Court:	U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit:	Prison Condition

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed	Description
April 21, 2015	Schlemm v. Frank

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 21, 2015	Filing 702513859 Filed opinion of the court by Judge Easterbrook. The judgment is AFFIRMED to the extent it rejects some claims as unexhausted and entitles two of the defendants to dismissal because they were not involved in the contested decisions. Otherwise the judgment is REVERSED and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. Frank H. Easterbrook, Circuit Judge; Ann Claire Williams, Circuit Judge and David F. Hamilton, Circuit Judge. [6657162-1] [6657162] [14-2604]

Date Filed

Document Text

April 21, 2015

Filing 702513859 Filed opinion of the court by Judge Easterbrook. The judgment is AFFIRMED to the extent it rejects some claims as unexhausted and entitles two of the defendants to dismissal because they were not involved in the contested decisions. Otherwise the judgment is REVERSED and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. Frank H. Easterbrook, Circuit Judge; Ann Claire Williams, Circuit Judge and David F. Hamilton, Circuit Judge. [6657162-1] [6657162] [14-2604]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: David Schlemm v. Matthew Frank, et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: DAVID A. SCHLEMM
Represented By:	David A. Schlemm
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: MATTHEW J. FRANK, in his individual and official capacities as Secretary of Wisconsin Department of Corrections
Represented By:	Jody J. Schmelzer
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: PHILLIP A. KINGSTON, in his individual and official capacities as Warden of Waupun Correctional Institution
Represented By:	Jody J. Schmelzer
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: EDWARD F. WALL
Represented By:	Jody J. Schmelzer
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?