USA v. Carl Kieffer
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
CARL FREDERICK KIEFFER |
14-2650 |
July 28, 2014 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 702575196 Filed opinion of the court PER CURIAM. The judgment is AFFIRMED, except that the award of restitution to the banks involved in the uncharged robberies is VACATED. The cases are REMANDED for entry of corrected judgments providing for no restitution in Case No. 13-CR-30251-MJR, $7,015 payable to Lusk State Bank in Case No. 14-CR-30051-MJR, and $3,600 payable to Fifth Third Bank in Case No. 14-CR-30052-MJR. Frank H. Easterbrook, Circuit Judge; Kenneth F. Ripple, Circuit Judge and Ann Claire Williams, Circuit Judge. [6680369-1] [6680369] [14-2650, 14-2652, 14-2653] |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: USA v. Carl Kieffer | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | Angela Scott |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant - appellant: CARL FREDERICK KIEFFER | |
Represented By: | Thomas C. Gabel |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.