James Turnell v. Centimark Corporation
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAMES TURNELL
Defendant - Appellee: CENTIMARK CORPORATION
Case Number: 14-2758
Filed: August 8, 2014
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
July 29, 2015 Summary Turnell v. Centimark Corp.

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 29, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 702577691 Filed opinion of the court by Judge Kanne. The district court's order granting a preliminary injunction in CentiMark's favor is AFFIRMED. Diane P. Wood, Chief Judge; Michael S. Kanne, Circuit Judge and John Daniel Tinder, Circuit Judge. [6681274-1] [6681274] [14-2758]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: James Turnell v. Centimark Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: JAMES TURNELL
Represented By: James E. Dahl
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: CENTIMARK CORPORATION
Represented By: Anthony G. Hopp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?