Harry Powell v. Nedra Chandler
Petitioner - Appellant: HARRY POWELL
Respondent - Appellee: NEDRA CHANDLER, Warden
Case Number: 14-2766
Filed: August 8, 2014
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
April 14, 2015 Harry Powell v. Donald Enloe

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 14, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 702508703 Filed Nonprecedential Disposition PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. We also have considered Powell's motion for recruitment of counsel filed on October 10, 2014, and DENY the motion. Frank H. Easterbrook, Circuit Judge; Kenneth F. Ripple, Circuit Judge and Ann Claire Williams, Circuit Judge. [6655257-1] [6655257] [14-2766]--[Text updated 04/14/2015 by JR.]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Harry Powell v. Nedra Chandler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant: HARRY POWELL
Represented By: Harry Powell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: NEDRA CHANDLER, Warden
Represented By: Michael M. Glick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?