Yury Paryev V. v. Eric Holder, Jr.
Petitioner: YURY V. PARYEV
Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General of the United States
Case Number: 14-3565
Filed: November 21, 2014
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
February 23, 2016 Yury Paryev V. v. Loretta E. Lynch

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 23, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 702706168 Filed Nonprecedential Disposition PER CURIAM. The Petition is DISMISSED to the extent we lack jurisdiction and DENIED as to the remainder. Diane P. Wood, Chief Judge; Richard A. Posner, Circuit Judge and Ann Claire Williams, Circuit Judge. [6730487-1] [6730487] [14-3565]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Yury Paryev V. v. Eric Holder, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: YURY V. PARYEV
Represented By: Sara Elizabeth Dill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General of the United States
Represented By: OIL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?