James Melton v. Tippecanoe County, Indiana
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAMES MELTON
Defendant - Appellee: TIPPECANOE COUNTY, INDIANA
Case Number: 14-3599
Filed: November 26, 2014
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
September 22, 2016 Summary Melton v. Tippecanoe Cnty.

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 22, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 702848719 Filed opinion of the court by Judge Kanne. AFFIRMED. Daniel A. Manion, Circuit Judge; Michael S. Kanne, Circuit Judge and Pamela Pepper, District Court Judge. [6784922-1] [6784922] [14-3599]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: James Melton v. Tippecanoe County, Indiana
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: JAMES MELTON
Represented By: Ronald E. Weldy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: TIPPECANOE COUNTY, INDIANA
Represented By: Douglas J. Masson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?