Larry Joiner v. Hill Correctional Center, et al
| LARRY D. JOINER |
| HILL CORRECTIONAL CENTER, Medical Staff/Department and KEVWE AKPORE, Warden, Previously sued as Warden of Galesburg Correctional Center |
| 15-1651 |
| March 25, 2015 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Larry Joiner v. Hill Correctional Center, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: LARRY D. JOINER | |
| Represented By: | Larry D. Joiner |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: HILL CORRECTIONAL CENTER, Medical Staff/Department | |
| Represented By: | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: KEVWE AKPORE, Warden, Previously sued as Warden of Galesburg Correctional Center | |
| Represented By: | Jan E. Hughes |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
