S.A.B. v. Loretta E. Lynch
S.A.B. |
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General of the United States |
15-1834 |
April 17, 2015 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 702929792 Filed opinion of the court by Judge Posner. SAB s petition for review of her final order of removal is denied, as is her petition for review that challenges the BIA s decision to deny her motion to reopen. Her remaining petition is dismissed for want of jurisdiction to review USCIS s discretionary rulings. Richard A. Posner, Circuit Judge; Frank H. Easterbrook, Circuit Judge and Diane S. Sykes, Circuit Judge. [6815831-1] [6815831] [15-1834, 15-3874, 16-1303] |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: S.A.B. v. Loretta E. Lynch | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: S.A.B. | |
Represented By: | Jennifer Yule DePriest |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General of the United States | |
Represented By: | OIL |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.