Curtis Ellison v. Dushan Zatecky
| CURTIS J. ELLISON |
| DUSHAN ZATECKY, Superintendent |
| 15-1884 |
| April 24, 2015 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
702742045
Filed opinion of the court by Judge Williams. Ellison is entitled to a disciplinary hearing comporting with Wolff or else his good time must be restored. Accordingly, the district court s decision is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings. Diane P. Wood, Chief Judge; Richard A. Posner, Circuit Judge and Ann Claire Williams, Circuit Judge. [6744159-1] [6744159] [15-1884]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Curtis Ellison v. Dushan Zatecky | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner - appellant: CURTIS J. ELLISON | |
| Represented By: | Curtis J. Ellison |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent - appellee: DUSHAN ZATECKY, Superintendent | |
| Represented By: | Kyle Hunter |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
