USA v. Approximately 64,695

Plaintiff - Appellee,: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Claimant - Appellant,: TAI LOONG HONG MARINE PRODUCTS, LIMITED
Defendant - Appellant,: APPROXIMATELY 64,695 POUNDS OF SHARK FINS
Case Number: 05-56274
Filed: August 26, 2005
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Oth Forfeiture and Penalty Suits

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date FiledDescription
March 17, 2008 USA v. Approximately 64,695
March 17, 2008 USA v. Approximately 64,695

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 17, 2008 920080317 Opinion or Order of the Court Opinion
Search for this case: USA v. Approximately 64,695
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee,: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Mary Lundberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Claimant - appellant,: TAI LOONG HONG MARINE PRODUCTS, LIMITED
Represented By: Bryan Y.Y. Ho
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant,: APPROXIMATELY 64,695 POUNDS OF SHARK FINS
Represented By: Bryan Y.Y. Ho
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.