Egebjerg v. Peter C. Anderson, et al

Trustee - Appellee,: PETER C. ANDERSON, United States Trustee
: In the Matter of: SCOTT LEE EGEBJERG
Debtor - Appellant,: SCOTT LEE EGEBJERG
Case Number: 08-55301
Filed: February 26, 2008
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Bankruptcy Appeals Rule 28 USC 158

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date FiledDescription
August 3, 2009 Egebjerg v. Peter C. Anderson, et al

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 29, 2009 920090529 Opinion or Order of the Court Opinion
August 3, 2009 920090803 Opinion or Order of the Court Opinion
Search for this case: Egebjerg v. Peter C. Anderson, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Trustee - appellee,: PETER C. ANDERSON, United States Trustee
Represented By: Kelsi Brown Corkran
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Debtor - appellant,: SCOTT LEE EGEBJERG
Represented By: Michael R. Totaro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.