Robert Poyson v. Charles Ryan

Robert Poyson v. Charles Ryan

Petitioner - Appellant,:	ROBERT ALLEN POYSON
Respondent - Appellee,:	CHARLES L. RYAN
Case Number:	10-99005
Filed:	March 19, 2010
Court:	U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus: Death Penalty

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed	Description
March 22, 2013	Poyson v. Ryan
November 7, 2013	ROBERT POYSON V. CHARLES RYAN
April 2, 2014	ROBERT POYSON V. CHARLES RYAN
January 12, 2018	Poyson v. Ryan

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 2, 2014	Filing 9025909866 Filed Order for PUBLICATION (SIDNEY R. THOMAS, RAYMOND C. FISHER and SANDRA S. IKUTA) The order filed November 7, 2013 is AMENDED. The order, as amended, reads as follows: Judge Thomas has voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc. Judge Ikuta has voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc and Judge Fisher has so recommended. The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R. App. P. 35(f). Appellant s petition for rehearing en banc, filed April 12, 2013, is DENIED. Appellant s petition for panel rehearing, filed April 12, 2013, remains pending. The panel will stay proceedings on the petition for panel rehearing pending resolution of en banc proceedings in McKinney v. Ryan, 730 F.3d 903 (9th Cir. 2013), rehearing en banc granted, 2014 WL 1013859 (Mar. 12, 2014). This opinion filed at 711 F.3d 1087 (9th Cir. 2013) is amended, and an Amended Opinion was filed concurrently with the original version of this Order. No further petitions will be entertained. The clerk shall stay the mandate. [9040544]
November 7, 2013	Filing 9025481727 Filed order and amended opinion (SIDNEY R. THOMAS, RAYMOND C. FISHER and SANDRA S. IKUTA) (Chief Judge Kozinski dissents from denial of en banc rehearing) .Judge Thomas has voted to grant the petition for panel hearing and petition for rehearing en banc. Judges Fisher and Ikuta have voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing. Judge Ikuta has voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc and Judge Fisher has so recommended. The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R. App. P. 35(f). Appellant s petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc, filed April 12, 2013, is denied. Chief Judge Kozinski s dissent from denial of en banc rehearing is filed concurrently with this Order. [8853869]

Date Filed

Document Text

April 2, 2014

Filing 9025909866 Filed Order for PUBLICATION (SIDNEY R. THOMAS, RAYMOND C. FISHER and SANDRA S. IKUTA) The order filed November 7, 2013 is AMENDED. The order, as amended, reads as follows: Judge Thomas has voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc. Judge Ikuta has voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc and Judge Fisher has so recommended. The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R. App. P. 35(f). Appellant s petition for rehearing en banc, filed April 12, 2013, is DENIED. Appellant s petition for panel rehearing, filed April 12, 2013, remains pending. The panel will stay proceedings on the petition for panel rehearing pending resolution of en banc proceedings in McKinney v. Ryan, 730 F.3d 903 (9th Cir. 2013), rehearing en banc granted, 2014 WL 1013859 (Mar. 12, 2014). This opinion filed at 711 F.3d 1087 (9th Cir. 2013) is amended, and an Amended Opinion was filed concurrently with the original version of this Order. No further petitions will be entertained. The clerk shall stay the mandate. [9040544]

November 7, 2013

Filing 9025481727 Filed order and amended opinion (SIDNEY R. THOMAS, RAYMOND C. FISHER and SANDRA S. IKUTA) (Chief Judge Kozinski dissents from denial of en banc rehearing) .Judge Thomas has voted to grant the petition for panel hearing and petition for rehearing en banc. Judges Fisher and Ikuta have voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing. Judge Ikuta has voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc and Judge Fisher has so recommended. The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R. App. P. 35(f). Appellant s petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc, filed April 12, 2013, is denied. Chief Judge Kozinski s dissent from denial of en banc rehearing is filed concurrently with this Order. [8853869]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Robert Poyson v. Charles Ryan
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant,: ROBERT ALLEN POYSON
Represented By:	Michael L. Burke
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent - appellee,: CHARLES L. RYAN
Represented By:	J. D. Nielsen
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?