Proshipline Inc, et al v. Aspen Infrastructures Ltd, et al

Plaintiff - Appellant,: PROSHIPLINE INC and EP-TEAM INC
Defendant - Appellee,: ASPEN INFRASTRUCTURES LTD, formerly known as Suzlon Infrastructure Ltd and SUZLON INFRASTRUCTURE LTD
Case Number: 11-35289
Filed: April 4, 2011
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Marine - Product Liability

Search for this case: Proshipline Inc, et al v. Aspen Infrastructures Ltd, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant,: PROSHIPLINE INC
Represented By: Steven Van Gibbons
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant,: EP-TEAM INC
Represented By: Steven Van Gibbons
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee,: ASPEN INFRASTRUCTURES LTD, formerly known as Suzlon Infrastructure Ltd
Represented By: Robert J. Bocko
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee,: SUZLON INFRASTRUCTURE LTD
Represented By: Robert J. Bocko
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.