William Lacy v. Braeburn Capital, et al
| WILLIAM LACY |
| BRAEBURN CAPITAL and APPLE |
| 13-16614 |
| August 9, 2013 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Antitrust |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2014. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: DEV) Dismissing case for failure to prosecute (Cir. Rule 42-1) Pursuant to Circuit Rule 42-1, this appeal is dismissed for failure to respond to order. (Order dated 10/23/2013), This order served on the district court shall constitute the mandate of this court. [8875299] (DEV) |
| Filing 7 Fee status changed ( [Case Number 13-16614: Due] ). [8832993] (AF) |
| Filing 6 Filed order (SIDNEY R. THOMAS and JOHNNIE B. RAWLINSON): Appellant’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis is denied because we find that the appeal is frivolous. If appellant wishes to pursue this appeal despite the court’s finding that it is frivolous then, within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall pay $455.00 to the district court as the docketing and filing fees for this appeal and file proof of payment with this court. Otherwise, the appeal will be dismissed by the Clerk for failure to prosecute, regardless of further filings. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. No motions for reconsideration, clarification, or modification of the denial of appellant’s in forma pauperis status shall be entertained. Because the court has found that this appeal is frivolous, the district court order may be summarily affirmed even if appellant pays the fees. If appellant pays the fees and files proof of such payment in this court, appellant therefore shall simultaneously show cause why the order challenged in this appeal should not be summarily affirmed. See 9th Cir. R. 3-6. If appellant pays the fees but fails to file a response to this order, the Clerk shall dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If the appeal is dismissed for failure to comply with this order, the court will not entertain any motion to reinstate the appeal that is not accompanied by proof of payment of the docketing and filing fees and a response to the order to show cause. Briefing is suspended pending further order of this court. [8832992] (AF) |
| Filing 5 Received Appellant William Lacy notice: Google Chief Ciounsel notified related evidence will be rpesented to the Court. Served on 9/17/13. [8791189] (EL) |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant William Lacy's Form 4 affidavit accompanying motion for permission to appeal In Forma Pauperis. Served on 08/22/2013. [8757641] (EL) |
| Filing 3 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due. [8741144] (CKP) |
| Filing 2 Fee status changed ( [Case Number 13-16614: Due] ). [8741142] (CKP) |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PROSE APPELLANT. NO APPEARANCE FR APPELLEES. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant William Lacy opening brief due 11/18/2013. [8737926] (GR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
