Kim Allen, et al v. Similasan Corporation
| KIM ALLEN and KATHLEEN HAIRSTON |
| LAINIE RIDEOUT, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated |
| SIMILASAN CORPORATION |
| 13-56014 |
| June 12, 2013 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Fraud |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2013. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Case rejected from Circuit Mediation Program. [8825305] (LW) [Entered: 10/17/2013 01:12 PM] |
| Filing 8 MANDATE ISSUED. (AWT, MDS and SSI) [8807663] (RL) [Entered: 10/03/2013 09:39 AM] |
| Filing 7 Filed order (A. WALLACE TASHIMA, MILAN D. SMITH, JR. and SANDRA S. IKUTA): A review of the record and the parties responses to this courts June 14, 2013 order to show cause demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [8775875] (AF) [Entered: 09/10/2013 10:43 AM] |
| Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Appellee Similasan Corporation reply to response to order to show cause dated 06/14/2013. Date of service: 07/15/2013. [8703507] (Herling, Daniel) [Entered: 07/15/2013 11:18 AM] |
| Filing 5 Filed (ECF) - Kim Allen, Kathleen Hairston and Appellant Lainie Rideout response to order to show cause dated 06/14/2013. Date of service: 07/03/2013. [8691347] (Marron, Ronald) [Entered: 07/03/2013 03:09 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellee Similasan Corporation Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 06/19/2013. [8674586]--[COURT UPDATE: Attached corrected form. Resent NDA. 06/20/2013 by RY] (Herling, Daniel) [Entered: 06/19/2013 06:24 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) - Kim Allen, Kathleen Hairston and Appellant Lainie Rideout Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 06/17/2013. [8670406] (Marron, Ronald) [Entered: 06/17/2013 02:42 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: SM): A review of the record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over the appeal because the order challenged in this appeal is not final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; see also WMX Techs., Inc. v. Miller, 104 F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir. 1997) (en banc) (dismissal of complaint with leave to amend is not appealable). Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall move for voluntary dismissal of the appeal or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellant elects to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of the memorandum. If appellant does not comply with this order, the Clerk shall dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court. [8667937] (AF) [Entered: 06/14/2013 10:45 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Mediation Questionnaire due on 06/19/2013. Transcript ordered by 07/11/2013. Transcript due 08/12/2013. Appellant Lainie Rideout opening brief due 09/19/2013. Appellee Similasan Corporation answering brief due 10/21/2013. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 14 days after service of the answering brief. [8664101] (GR) [Entered: 06/12/2013 08:04 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
