Frank Fazio, et al v. Apple, Inc.
: In re: IPHONE 4S CONSUMER LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellant,: FRANK M. FAZIO, CARLISA S. HAMAGAKI, DANIEL M. BALASONNE and BENJAMIN SWARTZMANN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee,: APPLE, INC., a California Corporation
Case Number: 14-15487
Filed: March 14, 2014
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
February 25, 2016 FRANK FAZIO V. APPLE, INC.

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Frank Fazio, et al v. Apple, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Represented By:
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant,: FRANK M. FAZIO
Represented By: Ben Barnow
Represented By: Stuart Andrew Davidson
Represented By: Mark J. Dearman
Represented By: Rachel L. Jensen
Represented By: James Notis
Represented By: Robert M. Rothman
Represented By: Jennifer Sarnelli
Represented By: Shawn Anthony Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant,: CARLISA S. HAMAGAKI
Represented By: Ben Barnow
Represented By: Stuart Andrew Davidson
Represented By: Mark J. Dearman
Represented By: Rachel L. Jensen
Represented By: James Notis
Represented By: Robert M. Rothman
Represented By: Jennifer Sarnelli
Represented By: Shawn Anthony Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant,: DANIEL M. BALASONNE
Represented By: Ben Barnow
Represented By: Stuart Andrew Davidson
Represented By: Mark J. Dearman
Represented By: Rachel L. Jensen
Represented By: James Notis
Represented By: Robert M. Rothman
Represented By: Jennifer Sarnelli
Represented By: Shawn Anthony Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant,: BENJAMIN SWARTZMANN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Represented By: Ben Barnow
Represented By: Stuart Andrew Davidson
Represented By: Mark J. Dearman
Represented By: Rachel L. Jensen
Represented By: James Notis
Represented By: Robert M. Rothman
Represented By: Jennifer Sarnelli
Represented By: Shawn Anthony Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee,: APPLE, INC., a California Corporation
Represented By: Aimee Halbert
Represented By: Matthew Stewart Kahn
Represented By: Gail Ellen Lees
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?