Shelby County, Alabama v. Eric Holder, et al
| Shelby County, Alabama |
| Eric H. Holder, Jr., In his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States |
| 11-5256 |
| September 27, 2011 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other Statutory Actions |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Shelby County, AL v. Holder, et al.
|
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2013. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 54
OPINION filed [1374370] (Pages: 63) for the Court by Judge Tatel, DISSENTING OPINION (Pages: 37) by Judge Williams [11-5256]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Shelby County, Alabama v. Eric Holder, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: Shelby County, Alabama | |
| Represented By: | Thomas Ryan McCarthy |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: Eric H. Holder, Jr., In his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States | |
| Represented By: | Robert Evans Kopp |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
