International Brotherhood v. Detroit Free Press, Inc.
| International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 1200 |
| Detroit Free Press, Inc., A subsidiary of Gannett Co., Inc., doing business as WUSA-TV |
| 13-7033 |
| March 7, 2013 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Labor/Management Relations Act |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Int'l Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. Detroit Free Press, Inc.
|
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
1207584842
OPINION filed [1487954] (Pages: 6) for the Court by Judge Randolph [13-7033]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: International Brotherhood v. Detroit Free Press, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 1200 | |
| Represented By: | Robert Edward Paul |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: Detroit Free Press, Inc., A subsidiary of Gannett Co., Inc., doing business as WUSA-TV | |
| Represented By: | Donald J. Munro |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
