USA v. Mark Stubblefield
Plaintiff - Appellee: United States of America
Defendant - Appellant: Mark Stubblefield
Case Number: 14-3051
Filed: July 31, 2014
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
April 29, 2016 Summary United States v. Stubblefield

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 29, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 1207810088 OPINION [1611053] filed (Pages: 11) for the Court by Judge Brown. [14-3051]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: USA v. Mark Stubblefield
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: United States of America
Represented By: Elizabeth Trosman
Represented By: Suzanne Grealy Curt
Represented By: USAO Appellate Counsel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: Mark Stubblefield
Represented By: Mark Stubblefield
Represented By: Warden (Otisville)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?