Ahmad Nurriddin v. Charles Bolden
Plaintiff - Appellant: Ahmad B. Nurriddin
Defendant - Appellee: Charles F. Bolden, Administrator, National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Case Number: 14-5156
Filed: June 26, 2014
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit
Nature of Suit: Jobs

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
April 5, 2016 Summary Nurriddin v. Bolden

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 5, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 1207803018 OPINION [1607195] filed PER CURIAM OPINION (Pages: 21), DISSENTING IN PART OPINION (Pages: 3) by Judge Wilkins. [14-5156]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Ahmad Nurriddin v. Charles Bolden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: Ahmad B. Nurriddin
Represented By: Joshua David Rogaczewski
Represented By: Jeffrey W. Mikoni
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: Charles F. Bolden, Administrator, National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Represented By: R. Craig Lawrence
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?