Diag Human S.E. v. Czech Republic - Ministry of H
Plaintiff - Appellant: Diag Human S.E.
Defendant - Appellee: Czech Republic - Ministry of Health
Case Number: 14-7142
Filed: September 22, 2014
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit
Nature of Suit: Arbitration

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
May 31, 2016 Summary Diag Human S.E. v. Czech Republic - Ministry of Health

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 31, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 1207818245 OPINION [1615464] filed (Pages: 13) for the Court by Judge Brown, DISSENTING OPINION (Pages: 6) by Judge Sentelle [14-7142]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Diag Human S.E. v. Czech Republic - Ministry of H
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: Diag Human S.E.
Represented By: Hyman L. Schaffer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: Czech Republic - Ministry of Health
Represented By: Dean A. Calland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?