USA v. Yonas Eshetu
| United States of America |
| Yonas Eshetu, also known as Yonas Sebsibe |
| 15-3020 |
| March 31, 2015 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 United States v. Eshetu
|
|
United States v. Eshetu
|
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
1208048632
OPINION [1743864] filed PER CURIAM OPINION (Pages: 4). [15-3020, 15-3021, 15-3023]
|
|
Filing
1207947298
OPINION [1685634] filed (Pages: 20) for the Court by Judge Henderson, OPINION CONCURRING in part and CONCURRING in the judgment (Pages: 8) by Judge Millett. [15-3020, 15-3021, 15-3023]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Yonas Eshetu | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellee: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Elizabeth Trosman |
| Represented By: | USAO Appellate Counsel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellant: Yonas Eshetu, also known as Yonas Sebsibe | |
| Represented By: | Christopher M. Davis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
