Chedick, Marcia v. Nash, Thomas, et al
Plaintiff - Appellee: Marcia Chedick
Defendant - Appellant: Thomas Nash, Capital City Mortgage Corporation and Capital City Mortgage Corporation
Case Number: 97-7096
Filed: June 9, 1997
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit
Nature of Suit: Bankruptcy Withdrawal 28 USC 157

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
August 7, 1998 Chedick, Marcia v. Nash, Thomas, et al

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Chedick, Marcia v. Nash, Thomas, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: Marcia Chedick
Represented By: Marcia K. Docter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: Thomas Nash, Capital City Mortgage Corporation
Represented By: Eric J. Sanne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: Capital City Mortgage Corporation
Represented By: Eric J. Sanne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?