Wright v. Strum et al
| William M. Wright |
| Michelle Strum and Efrain Ubinas |
| 1:2008cv00666 |
| April 2, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Arapahoe |
| Marcia S. Krieger |
| Craig B Shaffer |
| None |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
88
ORDER granting 82 Motion to Intervene filed by the Board of County Commissioners for the County of Arapahoe, Colorado. The Board of County Commissioners for the County of Arapahoe, Colorado is permitted to intervene as a party defendant and counter claimant. The Answer and Counterclaim of the Defendant-Intervenor Board of County Commissioners for the County of Arapahoe, Colorado was accepted for filing by the Clerk of the Court on 03/19/09, by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 05/12/09.(wjc, )
|
|
Filing
87
TRIAL PREPARATION ORDER-CIVIL: Final Pretrial Conference set for 12/29/2009 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom A 901 before Judge Marcia S. Krieger. by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 4/15/09. (msksec, )
|
|
Filing
86
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer: Preliminary Scheduling Conference held on 4/9/2009. Plaintiff's oral Motion to Withdraw 78 Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint is granted. Plaintiff's Mo tion to Amend Compliant is Withdrawn. Plaintiff may file a response to the Board of County Commissioners for the County of Arapahoe, Colorado's 82 Motion to Intervene no later than 04/24/09. Discovery due by 7/10/2009. Dispositive Motions due by 8/7/2009. (Court Reporter FTR - Linda Kahoe.) (wjc, )
|
|
Filing
76
ORDER granting in part 70 Mr. Wright's "Motion for Stay to Obtain Counsel." Preliminary Scheduling Conference set for 4/9/2009 at 09:15 AM in Courtroom A 402 before Magistrate Judge Craig B Shaffer, by Magistrate Judge Craig B Shaffer on 02/03/09.(wjc, )
|
|
Filing
75
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING, IN PART, MOTION TO DISMISS: The Defendants' 20 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED IN PART, insofar as the Court finds that the Plaintiff has successfully stated an 8th Amendment claim against the Defendants with regard to the delay in treating his broken writs, and GRANTED IN PART, with regard to any other claims allegedly asserted in the Amended Complaint, by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 2/2/09.(msksec, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
