Carani et al v. Darrel Meisner et al
Shelley Demarie Carani and Marco Carani |
William (I) Sappington, Erin Sims, Samuel Stewart, Kirk (I) Wilson, Kirk Wilson, John (I) Hier, John Hier, Wanda (I) Nelson, Wanda Nelson, Erin (I) Sims, Samuel (I) Stewart, Darrel (I) Meisner, Darrel Meisner, J. (I) R. Boulton, J. R. Boulton, William Sappington, Lou (I) Vallario, Lou Vallario, Scott (I) Dawson, Scott Dawson and Garfield County Detention Center |
1:2008cv02626 |
December 3, 2008 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Civil Rights: Other Office |
Garfield |
Marcia S. Krieger |
Craig B Shaffer |
Both |
Federal Question |
42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 227 OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO AMEND JUDGMENT: The Defendants' Motion to Amend Judgment 220 is DENIED. by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 2/9/12.(msksec, ) |
Filing 212 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING ATTORNEY'S FEES. Granting 169 Rifle Defendants' Motion for Attorney Fees. Fees are assessed in favor of the Rifle Defendants and against the Plaintiffs in the amount of $162,406.50. Granting 170 Ms. Si ms' Motion for Attorney Fees. Fees are assessed in favor of Ms. Sims and against the Plaintiffs in the amount of $35,502.50. Judgment 167 is deemed amended to award these sums. Granting in part and denying in part 196 Plaintiffs' Motion for Review of Taxation of Costs. Denying as moot Rifle Defendants' Supplemental 208 Motion for Attorney Fees, by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 3/31/11.(gmssl, ) |
Filing 204 COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer: A Motion Hearing was held on 12/14/2010. ORDERED: The Rifle Defendants, minus Ms. Sims, shall file Supplemental Briefs addressing all of the issues raised at today's oral argument on or before JANUARY 31, 2011. To the extent that Plaintiffs wish to file a Supplemental Brief directed to Ms. Sims, that brief shall be due on or before JANUARY 31, 2011. All Response Briefs are due on or before FEBRUARY 25, 2011. No Reply Briefs will be allowed. A ruling on Plaintiffs' Motion for Review, # 196 is deferred. By Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer. (FTR: Linda Kahoe) (cbscd) |
Filing 166 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. The Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment (# 116 , 132 ) are GRANTED in their entirety. Judgment in favor of each Defendant and against the Plaintiffs shall enter contemporaneously wi th this Order. Erin Sims' 94 Motion for Entry of Final Judgement is DENIED as moot, as final judgment as to all parties shall enter as a result of this Order. There being no further claims to adjudicate, the outstanding issue relating the admissibility of Mr. Cook's opinions (# 131 ) is moot. The Clerk of the Court shall terminate the motions at Docket # 115 and 150 , as moot, by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 07/30/2010.(wjc, ) |
Filing 165 Minute Entry - Courtroom Minutes for Final Pretrial Conference held before Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 6/16/2010. ORDER: Granting 133 Motion to File Exhibit Under Seal; granting 164 Unopposed Motion to Excuse Scott Dawson from Attendance at Final Pretrial Conference. Court Reporter Paul Zuckerman) (lbush) |
Filing 114 MINUTE ORDER - Joint Consent Motion to Revise Scheduling Order 112 is GRANTED. The report of Plaintiffs' new jail conditions expert, Mr. Cook, is to be served by December 14, 2009; Mr. Cook's deposition is to be taken at 1:00 p.m. PST (2 :00 p.m. MST) on December 16, 2009, at 111 SW 5th Ave, Suite # 2020, Portland, OR 97204-3623, tel #(503) 227-1544 Messrs. Freeman and Ringel to attend by phone; any dispositive motion as to jail conditions is to be filed by January 8, 2010; any rebut tal expert's report on jail conditions is to be served by January 15, 2010; deposition of any such jail conditions rebuttal expert is to be taken on February 5, 2010; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all other pretrial deadlines as stated in the Court's Scheduling Order, not modified herein, shall remain in effect by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 11/16/2009.(cbscd) |
Filing 99 MINUTE ORDER granting 95 Motion to Amend and granting 97 Motion for Extension of Time. Discovery due by 11/23/2009 and Dispositive Motions due by 12/4/2009, by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 9/17/09.(cbssec) |
Filing 90 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS: Defendant Erin Sims' 36 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. All claims in the Second Amended Complaint against Ms. Sims are DISMISSED, and the caption of this action is AMENDED to omit any reference to Ms. Sims, by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 08/26/09.(wjc, ) |
Filing 89 MINUTE ORDER granting 87 Plaintiffs' [Second] Unopposed Motion for Modification of Scheduling Order. Discovery due by 11/8/2009. Dispositive Motions due by 11/20/2009, by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 08/12/09.(wjc, ) |
Filing 86 MINUTE ORDER granting 84 Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion for Modification of Scheduling Order. Discovery due by 10/8/2009. Dispositive Motions due by 11/20/2009, by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 07/24/09.(wjc, ) |
Filing 61 TRIAL PREPARATION ORDER-CIVIL: Final Pretrial Conference set for 3/4/2010 at 04:00 PM in Courtroom A 901 before Judge Marcia S. Krieger, by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 2/18/09. (msksec, ) |
Filing 53 MINUTE ORDER granting 49 Joint Motion for Order Directing Removal of Garfield County Dentention Center as Listed Defendant on ECF System, by Magistrate Judge Craig B Shaffer on 02/02/09.(wjc, ) |
Filing 48 Stipulation and PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Craig B Shaffer on 01/28/09. (wjc, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.