Willingham v. Omaha Woodmen Life Insurance Society
Plaintiff: James Willingham
Defendant: Omaha Woodmen Life Insurance Society
Case Number: 1:2009cv00090
Filed: January 16, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Insurance Office
County: Douglas
Presiding Judge: Michael E. Hegarty
Presiding Judge: Marcia S. Krieger
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 19, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 43 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION. The Defendants 4 Motion to Compel Arbitration is GRANTED. The parties shall proceed to arbitrate the claims in this case according to the procedures set forth in the terms of Article 8, Sect ion 2(c), Step 3 of the Defendants Constitution and Laws. Pursuant to 9 U.S.C. § 3, the case is STAYED in all respects pending arbitration, and for administrative purposes, the Clerk of the Court shall close this case, by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 08/19/09.(wjc, )
May 26, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 34 MINUTE ORDER granting 32 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to Amend Scheduling Order. Discovery due by 10/30/2009. Dispositive Motions due by 11/30/2009, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 05/26/09.(wjc, )
March 17, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 24 MINUTE ORDER granting 22 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Answer on or before 03/27/09, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 03/17/09.(wjc, )
March 6, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 20 TRIAL PREPARATION ORDER-CIVIL: Final Pretrial Conference set for 3/11/2010 at 04:00 PM/b in Courtroom A 901 before Judge Marcia S. Krieger by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 3/6/09. (msksec, ) Modified on 3/10/2009 to correct text date of pretrial (wjc, ).
February 6, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER denying 9 Joint Motion to Stay Rule 26(f) Scheduling Order Deadline and Scheduling Conference by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 02/06/09.(wjc, )
January 29, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER REGARDING CUSTODY OF EXHIBITS AND DEPOSITIONS USED IN EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS AND TRIALS: Any exhibits and depositions used during evidentiary hearings or trials, counsel for the parties shall retrieve the originals of such exhibits and deposition s from the Court following the evidentiary hearing or trial, and shall retain same for 60 days beyond the later of the time to appeal or conclusion of any appellate proceedings. The Court will retain its copy of the exhibits for the same time period after which the documents will be destroyed, by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 1/29/09. (mskcd)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Willingham v. Omaha Woodmen Life Insurance Society
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Willingham
Represented By: Kevin C. Flesch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Omaha Woodmen Life Insurance Society
Represented By: Mark Cameron Willis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?