Ferguson v. Webster et al
| Mark B. Ferguson |
| Brian Webster, Barry Goldsmith and Bev Dowis |
| 1:2009cv02916 |
| December 11, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Fremont |
| Christine M. Arguello |
| Kathleen M. Tafoya |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
135
ORDER granting 134 the Parties Joint Stipulated Motion to Dismiss WITH PREJUDICE. Each party shall pay his/her or its own attorneys fees and costs, by Judge William J. Martinez on 11/25/2013.(ervsl, )
|
|
Filing
122
MINUTE ORDER granting 115 Plaintiffs Unopposed Motion to Allow Plaintiff to Attend Settlement Conference by Phone, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 9/13/2013.(ervsl, )
|
|
Filing
114
ORDER Setting Settlement Conference for 9/23/2013 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 9/6/13. (sgrim)
|
|
Filing
105
ORDER re: 34 MOTION for Summary Judgment on Doc. # 1 filed by Brian Webster, and Bev Dowis is DENIED in its entirety. By Judge William J. Martinez on 2/5/2013. (ervsl, )
|
|
Filing
101
ORDER ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING CASE pending disposition by the Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit of the Interlocutory Appeal. Nothing contained in this Order shall be considered a dismissal or final disposition of this case in this Court. Any party may move this Court to reopen this matter for good cause shown after issuance by the Tenth Circuit of its Mandate on the subject appeal, by Judge William J. Martinez on 3/27/2012. (ervsl, )
|
|
Filing
96
ORDER re: 91 Notice of Appeal filed by Brian Webster, Bev Dowis, This action is hereby STAYED pending resolution of Defendants interlocutory appeal to the Tenth Circuit; and All deadlines and settings in this matter, including, but not limited to, the Final Trial Preparation Conference on November 10, 2011 and the trial date of November 28, 2011, are hereby VACATED. by Judge William J. Martinez on 10/26/2011. (erv, )
|
|
Filing
83
ORDER denying 34 Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment in it's entirety by Judge William J. Martinez on 9/22/2011.(erv, )
|
|
Filing
71
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 32 Plaintiffs Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony of Paula Frantz, M.D. Pursuant to Rule 702 by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 5/4/2011.(erv, )
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER Setting Settlement Conference for 7/29/2011 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 4/7/11. (lsw, )
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER The parties are directed to confer and to file a Joint Status Report, Status Report due by 2/23/2011. by Judge William J. Martinez on 02/14/2011. (wjc, )
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER SETTING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: Settlement Conference set for 7/12/2010 01:30 PM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. Plaintiffs Counsel shall arrange for her client, Mark B. Ferguson, to beavailable by telephone for the Settlement Conference at the scheduled dateand time by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 3/16/2010. (kmtcd, )
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND RULE 26(f) PLANNING MEETING: Scheduling Conference set for 3/16/2010 09:30 AM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 12/18/2009. (kmtcd, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
