Park v. Fiserv Trust Corp. et al
Lori L. Park |
Fiserv Trust Corp., Fiserv Trust Company Corp., Fiserv ISS, Fiserv Inc., Lincoln Trust Company, Fiserv Clearing Inc. and Trust Industrial Bank, Inc. |
1:2010cv00189 |
January 28, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Denver |
Philip A. Brimmer |
Craig B. Shaffer |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 113 ORDER. Plaintiff's 102 Response to Federal Judge in Opposition to Order dated May 25, 2011, which the Court construes as a motion for reconsideration, is denied. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 11/9/11.(mnfsl, ) |
Filing 112 ORDER. Plaintiff's 98 Motion for Relief from Final Judgment and Request for New Proceeding/Trial pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) is denied. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 10/27/11.(mnfsl, ) |
Filing 100 ORDER denying 96 Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 5/25/11.(mnf, ) |
Filing 95 MINUTE ORDER denying as moot 94 Plaintiff's motion for clarification. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 5/9/11.(mnfsl, ) |
Filing 93 ORDER. The 86 Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge is accepted. Plaintiff's 74 Motion to Enlarge Time to Accept Appeal Notice is denied. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 5/3/11.(mnf, ) |
Filing 68 ORDER accepting 53 Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. Granting 38 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. All of plaintiff's claims are dismissed, and judgment shall enter in favor of defendants and against plaintiff, by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 12/7/10.(ebs, ) |
Filing 28 COURTROOM MINUTES - Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer: A Status Conference was held on 5/26/2010. ORDERED: Plaintiff's Motion to Amend, doc # 26 , is GRANTED. Title VII 3rd Amended Complaint, doc #[26-1 ], is accepted for filing as of today's date. A Scheduling Conference is set for 7/22/2010 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom A 402 before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer. Plaintiff is responsible for notifying Robert Beriault Holdings, Inc. of the da te and time of the Scheduling Conference. A Proposed Scheduling Order shall be filed no later than 7/15/2010. A Rule 26(f) conference shall be held no later than 7/8/2010. The parties are required to exchange Rule 26(a) disclosures no later than 7/6/2010. By Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer. (Court Reporter FTR - Linda Kahoe) (cbscd) |
Filing 22 COURTROOM MINUTES - Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer: A Status Conference was held on 4/13/2010. ORDERED: The Motion to Sanction Defendant Attorney, doc # 9 is DENIED; the Title VII Amended Complaint, doc # 11 is WITHDRAWN; Plaintiff's oral motion to withdraw the Motion to Amend, doc # 13 is GRANTED and the Motion to Amend, doc # 13 is WITHDRAWN; a Scheduling Conference is set for 5/26/2010 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom A 402 before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer; a Proposed Scheduling Order is due by 5/20/2010; Rule 26(f) conference shall be held by 5/14/2010; Rule 26(a) disclosures due by 5/14/2010 by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer. (Court Reporter FTR - Linda Kahoe) (cbscd) |
Filing 6 ORDER setting Scheduling Conference for 4/13/2010 at 9:15 a.m., in Courtroom A 402, by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 2/5/10. (cbssec) |
Filing 5 ORDER denying 2 Motion for Order to have US Marshals serve complaint by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 2/3/2010.(cbscd) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.