Moore v. Miller et al
| James D. Moore |
| Shawn (I) Miller, Shawn Miller, John (I) Robledo, John Robledo and City and County of Denver, The |
| 1:2010cv00651 |
| March 19, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| John L. Kane |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
151
ORDER Dismissing Defendant City and County of Denver With Prejudice. Each party to pay his or its own attorney fees and costs. Entered by Judge John L. Kane on 09/17/15. (jhawk, )
|
|
Filing
149
ORDER re: 148 Stipulation of Dismissal, DISMISSING defendant's Shawn Miller and John Robledo WITH PREJUDICE, by Judge John L. Kane on 09/08/2015. (cthom, )
|
|
Filing
123
ORDER denying 104 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment by Judge John L. Kane on 05/28/14.(jhawk, )
|
|
Filing
114
ORDER granting 113 Motion for Leave to file documents, by Judge John L. Kane on 10/1/2013.(trlee, )
|
|
Filing
95
ORDER granting 90 Motion to Enforce Order to Compel Discovery and Granting Leave to File Motion for Reasonable Attorney Fees Associated With Discovery Motion Practice by Judge John L. Kane on 06/06/13.(jjhsl, )
|
|
Filing
89
ORDER Granting 88 Stipulated Motion to Extend Time to Disclose Expert Witnesses and Submit Dispositive Motions. Dispositive Motions due by 6/28/2013, by Judge John L. Kane on 4/10/13.(sgrim)
|
|
Filing
84
ORDER Granting Defendants Motion to Compel 72 , by Judge John L. Kane on 3/11/13.(sgrim)
|
|
Filing
69
MINUTE ORDER granting 68 Stipulated Motion to Modify Scheduling and Discovery Order and Extend Discovery Cut-Off. Discovery due by 3/3/2013. Dispositive Motions due by 5/8/2013, by Judge John L. Kane on 11/15/12.(sgrim)
|
|
Filing
67
MINUTE ENTRY for Status Conference held on 8/22/2012 before Judge John L. Kane: Oral Request by Defendant to withdraw 23 Motion For Partial Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Discovery is continued to 12/3/12. Disclosure of experts by 2/4/13. Defendant may re-file its motion for summary judgment by 3/6/13. Court Reporter: Janet Coppock. (sgrim)
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER. Discovery due by 8/10/2012. Status Conference set for 8/22/2012 10:00 AM before Judge John L. Kane, by Judge John L. Kane on 7/9/12. (sgrim)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER. Plaintiff's 26 Motion to Hold Dispositive Motion in Abeyance Pending Resolution of Discovery Matters is granted. The discovery order entered in Graber v. City & County of Denver, 1:09-cv-1029-JLK-MJW (doc. 83), is adopted in this case, and briefing on Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment shall be stayed pending completion of discovery. Status Conference set for 10/21/2011 at 11:00 AM before Judge John L. Kane. At that status conference, Defendants should be prepared to provide an update on their compliance with their discovery obligations, and the parties should provide a proposed briefing schedule. By Judge John L. Kane on 9/26/11.(mnf, )
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER denying as moot 14 Plaintiff's Motion for a Protective Order; granting 19 Plaintiff's Motion to Withdraw the Motion for Protective Order, by Judge John L. Kane on 03/04/2011.(wjc, )
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER granting 16 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to Modify Scheduling Order to Extend Time to Conduct Discovery and Submit Dispositive Motions. Discovery due by 5/24/2011. Dispositive Motions due by 7/5/2011, by Judge John L. Kane on 02/16/2011.(wjc, )
|
|
Filing
13
STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER by Judge John L. Kane on 11/15/2010. (wjc, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
