Vogt v. EchoStar Communications Corporation et al
Eric Vogt |
EchoStar Communications Corporation, Echosphere, L.L.C., EchoStar Statellite, L.L.C, DISH Network Corporation and Dish Network, L.L.C. |
1:2010cv01192 |
May 21, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Arapahoe |
Zita L. Weinshienk |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12117 American With Disabilities Act (ADA) |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 28 OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO VACATE ARBITRATION AWARD: The Court finds that Mr. Vogt has failed to establish any basis to vacate the arbitration award. Accordingly, Mr. Vogt's Motion to Vacate Arbitration Award and Remand for New Hearing 22 is DENIED. by Chief Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 5/21/13. Text Only Entry(msksec, ) |
Filing 13 ORDER. The parties Joint Motion to Compel Arbitration 12 is GRANTED.The parties shall proceed to arbitration in accordance with the terms of their agreement. This action is hereby administratively closed pursuant to D.C. COLO. L. Civ. R. 41.2, unless and until this action is reopened for good cause shown. By Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 07/21/2010.(sah, ) |
Filing 3 ORDER Scheduling Conference set for 8/18/2010 09:00 AM in Courtroom A 502 before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 6/7/2010. (mjwcd) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.