Gorsuch, Ltd. v. Wells Fargo National Bank Association
Plaintiff: Gorsuch, Limited at Aspen, Gorsuch, Limited at Keystone Mountain, Gorsuch Cooper, LLC, Gorsuch, Ltd. and Gorsuch, Ltd., B.C.
Defendant: Wells Fargo National Bank Association
Case Number: 1:2011cv00970
Filed: April 12, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Eagle
Presiding Judge: Philip A. Brimmer
Presiding Judge: Michael E. Hegarty
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 17, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 109 FINAL JUDGMENT by Clerk re: 108 Order, by Clerk on 12/17/2013. (klyon, )
December 13, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 108 ORDER. The 95 Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge is adopted. The 71 Motion for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint is denied. The 92 Objection to Courtroom/Minute Order Filed September 5, 2013, Denying Plaintiffs' Motion to Correct Minute Order [Docket No. 90] is overruled. This case is closed. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 12/13/13.(mnfsl, )
September 5, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 92 COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty: Motion Hearing held on 9/5/2013, taking under advisement 71 Plaintiffs' [sic] Motion for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint, and denying 90 Plaintiffs' [sic] Motion to Correct Minute Order. FTR: C. Pearson -- Courtroom A-501. (mehcd)
August 21, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 89 ORDER granting 76 Amended Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 8/21/13.(mnfsl, )
August 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 82 MINUTE ORDER granting 72 Motion for Leave to File Motion to Amend in Excess of the Page Limitation Set Forth in PAB Civ. Practice Standard III.A. granting and 77 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Response to Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint in Excess of the Page Limitation Set Forth in PAB Civ. Practice Standard III.A. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 8/1/2013.(klyon, )
May 8, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 68 ORDER. Plaintiffs' 64 Motion to Reopen Case Pursuant to Court's March 14,2013 Order [Docket No. 63] is granted. This case is reopened. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 5/8/13.(mnfsl, )
March 14, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 63 ORDER. The 57 Motion to Reconsider December 3, 2012 Order Dismissing Case Without Prejudice is granted. The December 3, 2012, 56 Order dismissing the case is vacated. The 58 Motion for Extension of Time to File Motion to Reopen Case Pursuant to Local Rule 41.2 is granted. Plaintiffs shall file any motion to reopen the case by or before Friday, 4/5/2013. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 3/14/13.(mnfsl, )
April 26, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 55 MINUTE ORDER. Plaintiffs' 47 motion for leave to file second amended complaint is denied without prejudice to refiling if this matter is reopened at some future date. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 4/26/12.(mnfsl, )
December 19, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 49 MINUTE ORDER. Plaintiffs' 47 motion for leave to file second amended complaint and 48 second amended complaint will be held in abeyance until such time as the Court reopens the case. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 12/19/11.(mnfsl, )
November 17, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ORDER. Defendant's 14 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Second Claim for Relief as Amended Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) is granted. Plaintiffs Gorsuch Ltd., B.C.; Gorsuch, Limited at Aspen; Gorsuch, Limited at Keystone Mountain; and Gorsuch Cooper, LLC are dismissed from this case. Plaintiff's 22 Motion to Stay Arbitration Proceeding Between Gorsuch, Ltd. and Wells Fargo National Bank Association,, the 28 Third Party Beneficiary Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summa ry Judgment Re: Breach of Contract, and 30 plaintiff's motion for leave to file a surreply are denied as moot. Defendant's 15 Motion to Compel Arbitration as to Amended Claims Asserted by Plaintiff Gorsuch, Ltd. and to Stay Further Proc eedings as to Such Claims is granted. This case is stayed and the parties shall proceed with the arbitration agreement. This case shall be administratively closed, pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 41.2. If no action is taken to reopen this case before 12/1/2012, the case will be dismissed without prejudice without any further notice to either party. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 11/17/11.(mnfsl, )
August 5, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 40 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING CONFIDENTIALITY. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 8/5/11. (mnfsl, )
August 3, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 35 MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 33 Joint Motion to Approve Stipulated Protective Order Regarding Confidentiality. The proposed Stipulated Protective Order is refused. The Clerk of the Court is directed to strike the "Stipulation" filed at docket # 32 . By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 8/3/11.(mnf, )
May 11, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER denying as moot 5 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 5/11/11.(mnf, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gorsuch, Ltd. v. Wells Fargo National Bank Association
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wells Fargo National Bank Association
Represented By: Brian J. Berardini
Represented By: David Cameron Walker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gorsuch, Limited at Aspen
Represented By: Richard B. Podoll
Represented By: Robert Alan Kitsmiller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gorsuch, Limited at Keystone Mountain
Represented By: Robert Alan Kitsmiller
Represented By: Richard B. Podoll
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gorsuch Cooper, LLC
Represented By: Robert Alan Kitsmiller
Represented By: Richard B. Podoll
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gorsuch, Ltd.
Represented By: Richard B. Podoll
Represented By: Robert Alan Kitsmiller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gorsuch, Ltd., B.C.
Represented By: Richard B. Podoll
Represented By: Robert Alan Kitsmiller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?