Holt v. Mcbride et al
| Joseph Holt |
| Joseph Wermers, Department of Corrections, Kathy (I) Mcbride, Kathy Mcbride and Joseph (I) Wermers |
| 1:2011cv01615 |
| June 20, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Fremont |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
67
FINAL JUDGMENT pursuant to 66 Order by Clerk on 2/15/13. (dkals, )
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER. Defendant Dr. Kathy McBride is dismissed without prejudice. This case shall be dismissed in its entirety. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 2/14/13. (mnfsl, )
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER. The 51 Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge is accepted. Defendant Dr. Joseph Wermers' 45 Motion to Dismiss is granted. Defendant Dr. Joseph Wermers is dismissed from this case. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 1/29/13.(mnfsl, )
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER ACCEPTING 48 MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S RECOMMENDATION. The 24 CDOC Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is granted. Plaintiff's claims against defendant Joice Chrunk are dismissed. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 5/29/12.(mnfsl, )
|
|
Filing
44
MINUTE ORDER granting in part and denying in part 42 Plaintiff's letter, construed as a Motion to Clarify and for a Continuance, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 2/27/2012. (mehcd)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER. On 1/27/2012, Plaintiff filed a 38 Letter with the Court describing the merits of his case. Although Plaintiff's letter does not refer to the Court's order to show cause or to the CDOC Defendants' motion to dismiss, the Court construes the letter liberally as a response to both. Therefore, Defendant Chrunk may file a reply in support of the CDOC Defendants Motion to Dismiss on or before 2/23/2012. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 2/16/12. (mnfsl, )
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER: Plaintiff's letter 31 is contrued by the Court as a Notice of Dismissal and a Motion to Appoint Counsel. The Court accepts the Notice and denies the Motion to Appoint Counsel. Pursuant to the Notice of Dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), the Plaintiff's claims against J. Shoemaker, Dr. Franze, Dr. FishDePena, Srg. Buena Vida, and Officer Degroot aredismissed without prejudice. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 1/17/2012. (mehcd)
|
|
Filing
30
MINUTE ORDER granting 26 Defendants' Motion to Stay Discovery and Vacate January 6, 2012 Scheduling Conference. Discovery as to the CDOC Defendants is temporarily stayed, pending resolution of the motions to dismiss. The parties shall file a status report within three business days of receiving a ruling on the motion to dismiss, indicating what scheduling, if any, is needed. The Scheduling Conference set for 1/6/2012 is hereby vacated. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 12/29/2011. (mehcd)
|
|
Filing
29
MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 25 Defendants' Motion to Amend Caption. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 12/22/11.(mnfsl, )
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER Granting Service by U.S. Marshal, by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 10/25/11. (gmssl, )
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER to Dismiss in Part and to Draw Case to A District Judge and to a Magistrate Judge. Defendant DOC Clinical Services is dismissed as a party to this action because Plaintiff's claim is barred by Eleventh Amendment immunity. This case shall be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate judge. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 10/20/2011. (sah, )
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER Directing Plaintiff to File Amended Complaint, by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 9/13/11. (lsw, )
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER Directing Plaintiff to Cure Deficiency, within 30 days, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 6/28/11. (lyg, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
