Harris v. Lumbard et al
| Clyde Harris |
| Laura Franklin, Noel Ikedo and Michael Lumbard |
| 1:2011cv02461 |
| September 19, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Logan |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
46
ORDER Affirming 45 Report and Recommendations by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 9/6/13. 40 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted, the Defendants are dismissed, and this case is closed. (dkals, )
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER granting 30 Plaintiff's Motion to File Amend (sic) Complaint. The Clerk of Court is directed to file Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 30-1). Defendants shall file their Answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint on or before 11/1/2012. No dates contained in the 25 Scheduling Order will be amended or changed by this Order. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 10/18/12.(mnfsl, )
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER Preliminary Scheduling Conference set for 2/23/2012 09:30 AM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 2/1/2012. (kmtcd)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER DRAWING CASE. This case shall be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate judge. By Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 12/13/2011. (sah, )
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER Directing Plaintiff to File Amended Complaint, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 11/2/11. (lyg, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
