United States of America v. SG Interests I, Ltd. et al
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: SG Interests I, Ltd., SG Interests VII, Ltd. and Gunnison Energy Corporation
Case Number: 1:2012cv00395
Filed: February 15, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Richard P. Matsch
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 22, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 33 Courtroom Minutes for Motion Hearing held on 4/22/2013 before Judge Richard P. Matsch. ORDERED: Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Entry of Final Judgment with Respect to Defendant Gunnison Energy Corporation, 25 , is granted. Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Entry of Final Judgment with Respect to Defendants SG Interests I, LTD. And Sg Interests VII, LTD., 26 , is granted. FTR: K. Terasaki. (rpmcd)
December 12, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER denying 18 Motion for Entry of Final Judgment by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 12/12/12.(jjhsl, )
June 5, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER Granting 14 Motion to Authorize an Alternative Method of Public Dissemination of Tunney Act Comments. As an alternative method of public dissemination, the publication in the Federal Register of a statement providing the location on the United States Department of Justice website where the public comments may be viewed and downloaded, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 6/5/2012.(rpmcd)
February 16, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER re: 3 Magistrate Judge Consent Jurisdiction. No order of reference to a Magistrate Judge will be entered other than a possible limited order of reference for a particular purpose, signed by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 2/16/2012. (rpmcd )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. SG Interests I, Ltd. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: Patricia A. Brink
Represented By: Kathleen S. O'Neill
Represented By: Leslie C. Overton
Represented By: Sharis A. Pozen
Represented By: William H. Stallings
Represented By: Sarah Lorraine Wagner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SG Interests I, Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SG Interests VII, Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gunnison Energy Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?