Earsom et al v. Monteiro
| Deryl Earsom, Frances Brown, Deryl (I) Earsom and Frances (I) Brown |
| Luiz Henrique Monteiro |
| 1:2012cv01366 |
| May 25, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Douglas |
| Richard P. Matsch |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
28
ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice, each party to bear their own attorney fees and costs, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 6/20/2014. (jsmit)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER Granting 23 Motion to Stay: pending completion of settlement and Probate Court approval, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 3/28/2014.(jsmit)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER FOR NOTIFICATION : principal of Roberts Levin Rosenberg PC shall notify this Court and opposing counsel on or before February 28, 2014, as to the status of representation of Defendant Monteiro including the withdrawal of former counsel, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 2/21/2014, motion 19 terminated. (rpmcd )
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER Setting Scheduling Conference for 9/12/2013 at 10:30 AM in Conference Room, proposed order (original only) on paper, shall be submitted directly to chambers by 4:00 p.m. on September 5, 2013 and lead counsel present in person. Initial disclosures under Rule 26(a)(1) will be completed no later than 10 calendar days before the scheduling conference, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 7/25/2013. (rpmcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
