Viesti Associates, Inc. v. Pearson Education, Inc.
||Viesti Associates, Inc.
||Pearson Education, Inc.
||June 1, 2012
||Colorado District Court
||Wiley Y. Daniel
||Craig B. Shaffer
|Nature of Suit:
||Intellectual Property - Copyrights
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download.
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|April 15, 2013||51|| FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW RE: PLAINTIFFS FIRST MOTION TO COMPEL [DOC. #36]. The Court grants 36 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel in part in that it strikes Defendant's Subpart Objections and defers a decision on Plaintiffs requ est for information relating to Defendant's settlement of other copyright infringement claims until Plaintiff can review Defendant's summary chart and pursue publically available settlement information. By Magistrate Judge David L. West on 4/15/13.(mnfsl, )|
|March 26, 2013||45|| ORDER denying 12 Pearson Education, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint. Within thirty days of entry of this order, defendant Pearson Education, Inc. may file a motion for summary judgment related to Wolfgang Kaehler's assignment of rights only, and such motion is not to exceed 15 pages. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 3/26/13.(mnfsl, )|
|March 11, 2013||44|| ORDER granting 40 Joint Motion to Modify Scheduling Order. Discovery due by 5/31/2013. Dispositive Motions due by 6/28/2013. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 7/26/2013. Final Pretrial Conference set for 8/2/2013 at 02:30 PM before Magistrate Judge David L. West. By Magistrate Judge David L. West on 3/11/13.(mnfsl, )|
|October 4, 2012||33|| STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER. By Magistrate Judge David L. West on 10/4/12. (mnfsl, )|
|June 5, 2012||7|| ORDER setting a Scheduling Conference on 7/23/2012 at 9:15 AM in Courtroom A 402 before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer, by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 6/5/12. (cbssec)|
Last Document Downloaded: April 17, 2013 02:44:16 PDT
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER