TOG, Inc. et al v. United States Postal Service et al
| TOG, Inc. and Wild Harvest, LLC |
| United States Postal Service, Innovations Group, Inc. and Omar Dajani |
| 1:2012cv01946 |
| July 26, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| John L. Kane |
| Antitrust |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
46
FINAL JUDGMENT. ORDERED that FINAL JUDGMENT on Plaintiffs antitrust claims IS HEREBY ENTERED in favor of the defendants and against the plaintiffs WITH PREJUDICE, and the Amended Complaint and this civil action are dismissed and closed by Clerk on 09/05/13. (jjhsl, )
|
|
Filing
42
Memorandum Opinion and Order. The United States Postal Services Motion to Dismiss the Plaintiffs' antitrust claims is GRANTED on the ground that the USPS is not a person under the Meyer standard or the PAEA based on its conduct in imposing o r altering the terms of its contracts with CPUs. While the USPSs conduct in changing the playing field with regard to blank label roll sourcing and IGI's strong-arm tactics in getting CPUs to purchase those rolls at supracompetitive prices ma y subject either or both to othercauses of action under the PAEA or other statutory or common law theories of relief, they do not subject either to antitrust liability on the grounds alleged. Because IGI's Motion to Dismiss is premised on the same immunity defense as the USPSs, that Motion is now MOOT and is DENIED as such. Counsel shall CONFER and SUBMIT a Joint Status Report on or before July 19, 2013, on how they wish to proceed in light of the Court's ruling by Judge John L. Kane on 07/03/13.(jjhsl, )
|
|
Filing
41
MINUTE ENTRY for Oral Argument proceedings held before Judge John L. Kane on 4/24/2013. Granting 40 Motion for Leave; Finding as moot 19 Motion to Dismiss; Finding as moot 20 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; taking UNDER ADVISEMENT 23 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; taking UNDER ADVISEMENT 24 Motion to Dismiss. Court Reporter: Terri Lindblom. (babia)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER Setting Oral Argument on Motions to Dismiss 19 , 20 . 23 , and 24 - AMENDED. Counsel are directed to CONFER regarding the substance of this Order and then to CONTACT chambers (at 303.844.6118) to schedule a mutually agreeable time for oral argument sometime in April 2013. Counsel will be directed to submit a Status Report no later than five days before the scheduled argument, by Judge John L. Kane on 3/18/13. (sgrim)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER Setting Oral Argument on Motions to Dismiss 19 , 20 , 23 , and 24 . Counsel are directed to CONFER regarding the substance of this Order and then to CONTACT chambers (at 303.844.6118) to schedule a mutually agreeable time for oral argum ent sometime in April 2013. Counsel will be directed to submit a Status Report no later than five days before the scheduled argument, by Judge John L. Kane on 3/17/13. (sgrim) Modified on 3/18/2013 as this document is SUPERSEDED by 34 pursuant to chamber's instructions. (sgrim)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
