Baker v. Banner Health et al
| Martha L. Baker |
| Banner Health and Banner Medical Group Colorado |
| USA |
| 1:2012cv03029 |
| November 16, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Denver |
| William J. Martinez |
| Craig B. Shaffer |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 31 U.S.C. ยง 3729 - False Claims Act -- Liability |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
91
JUDGMENT AWARDING ATTORNEYS' FEES AND EXPENSES. re: 90 , by clerk on 11/15/2016. (dhans, ) Modified to change document type to "opinion" on 11/16/2016 (cthom, ).
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER denying 60 Motion for Reconsideration by Judge William J. Martinez on 06/29/2015.(cthom, )
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER granting 51 Bakers Early Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, by Judge William J. Martinez on 5/27/2015.(evana, )
|
|
Filing
44
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 12/16/14. ORDERED that when filing restricted documents, parties MUST fully comply with the requirements of D.C.ColoL.CivR. 7.2. (cbssec)
|
|
Filing
23
AMENDED ORDER on the Governments Motion to Unrestrict Case and Maintain Level 2 Restriction of Certain Pleadings. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to unrestrict this case and all fillings except docket entries at ECF Nos. 10 and 12, which shall remain RESTRICTED with a restriction Level 2, by Judge William J. Martinez on 7/31/2014. (evana, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
