Driskell v. Thompson et al
Plaintiff: Robert J. Driskell
Defendant: Bank of America N.A. and Bruce R Thompson
Case Number: 1:2012cv03107
Filed: November 28, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: El Paso
Presiding Judge: Robert E. Blackburn
Presiding Judge: Kristen L. Mix
Nature of Suit: Banks and Banking
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 31, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 48 JUDGMENT by Clerk in favor of Bruce R Thompson against Robert J. Driskell re: 47 Order, by Clerk on 10/31/2013. (klyon, )
October 30, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 47 ORDER adopting 46 Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Defendant Bruce R. Thompson's Motion To Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(5) and (6) [# 42 ] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Plaintiff's claims against the remaining defendants, Bruce R. Thompsonand John Doe 1-100, are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 10/30/2013.(klyon, )
September 10, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER adopting 44 Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R.Civ. P. 12(b)(6) [# 21 ] is granted. Plaintiff's claims against defendant, Bank of Americ a, N.A., alleging violations of the Fourth, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendments, are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff's claims against defendant, Bank of America, N.A., alleging fraud, violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, and violation of the Seventh Amendment, are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. At the time judgment enters, Judgment shall enter on behalf of defendant, Bank of America, N.A., against Plaintiff, Robert J. Driskell. Defendant, Bank of America, N.A., is DROPPED as a named party to this action,and the case caption AMENDED accordingly. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 9/10/2013.(klyon, )
January 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER ADOPTING RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. The Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge 10 is APPROVED AND ADOPTED as an order of this court; and plaintiff's Motion for Ex Parte Order for Temporary Injunction/Restraining Order 4 is DENIED. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 1/8/13. (kfinn, )
November 30, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER Drawing Case. This case shall be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate judge, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 11/30/12. (nmmsl, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Driskell v. Thompson et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bank of America N.A.
Represented By: Victoria Elena Edwards
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bruce R Thompson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert J. Driskell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?