Larson v. OneBeacon Insurance Company
| Douglas Larson |
| One Beacon Insurance Company |
| 1:2012cv03150 |
| December 3, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Mesa |
| Marcia S. Krieger |
| Kristen L. Mix |
| Insurance |
| 12 U.S.C. ยง 635 Breach of Insurance Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
125
JUDGMENT in favor of One Beacon Insurance Company against Douglas Larson re: 124 Opinion and Order Dismissing Claim, Order on Motion to Strike, by Clerk on 10/8/15. (pglov)
|
|
Filing
124
OPINION AND ORDER DISMISSING CLAIM and denying as moot 120 Motion to Strike re 117 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment, by Chief Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 10/7/15.(pglov)
|
|
Filing
117
ORDER GRANTING 98 Defendant's Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment by Chief Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 3/31/15.(pglov)
|
|
Filing
79
MINUTE ORDER granting 77 Unopposed Motion to Amend Phase II Scheduling Order (Doc. Nos. 32 & 43). The Phase II Scheduling Order is amended to extend the following deadlines: Affirmative Expert Disclosure Deadline 12/16/2013 and Rebuttal Expert Disclosure Deadline 1/16/2014. By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 11/20/2013.(klyon, )
|
|
Filing
73
Opinion and ORDER Overruling 67 Objections, adopting 61 Recommendation, and granting in part and denying in part 12 Motion for Summary Judgment. One Beacon's Objections (# 67 ) are OVERRULED and the Court ADOPTS the Recommendation (# 61 ). One Beacon's Motion for Summary Judgment (# 12 ) is GRANTED IN PART, insofar as One Beacon is entitled to summary judgment on thePlaintiff's breach of express contract claim, and DENIED IN PART, without prejudice, with regard to the bad faith claim. The Plaintiff's Objections (# 50 ) are DEEMED WITHDRAWN. The Plaintiff's Motion to Stay (# 59 ) is DENIED AS MOOT. By Chief Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 9/25/2013.(klyon, )
|
|
Filing
66
MINUTE ORDER granting 63 Unopposed Motion to Amend 61 Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 9/6/2013.(klyon, )
|
|
Filing
62
MINUTE ORDER denying 57 Renewed Motion to Stay Phase II Discovery. The hearing on the Motion [#57] set for 8/29/2013 at 2:00 p.m. is VACATED. By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 8/23/2013.(klyon, )
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER: Plaintiff's oral Motion to Compel Response to Request for Production No. 1 [see Docket No. 27 ; Hearing held 3/25/2013] is granted in part and denied in part, as outlined. The Motion is denied as to all documents not ordered to be produced in this Order. On or before 6/13/2013, Defendant shall produce to Plaintiff the documents responsive to Plaintiff's Request for Production No. 1, as outlined above. By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 6/10/2013. (klyon, )
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER: On or before 5/23/2013, the parties shall file a Joint Status Report indicating whether discovery of the documents listed in Paragraph Nos. 3, 5, and 6 are still in dispute. By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 5/20/2013. (klyon, )
|
|
Filing
43
MINUTE ORDER: The Motion to Amend [# 41 ] is GRANTED. Discovery Deadline is 2/3/2014 and Dispositive Motions Deadline is 3/3/2014. Defendant's Motion to Stay [# 35 ] is DENIED without prejudice. By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 5/16/2013.(klyon, )
|
|
Filing
31
TRIAL PREPARATION ORDER - CIVIL by Chief Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 4/4/13. (msksec, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
