Bartnick et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
| William Bartnick and Laura Larkins Bartnick |
| Lance Smith, Lance (I) Smith, Tricia Langon, Tricia (I) Langon, Ronald Noffsinger, Gary Sears, Daniel Lee Brotzman, Miguel Drake, City of Englewood, Robert (I) McCaslin, State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, State Farm Insurance Companies, Greg Pickett, Vincent Ross Atencio, Vincent (I) Ross Atencio, Chris Carmen, Daniel (I) Lee Brotzman, James (I) Woodward, Anne Drake, Robin Noffsinger, Gary (I) Sears, Robert McCaslin and James Woodward |
| 1:2012cv03208 |
| December 7, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Arapahoe |
| R. Brooke Jackson |
| Michael J. Watanabe |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
109
ORDER denying 107 Plaintiff's [sic] Rule 59(e) Motion in Response to Prejudicial Orders Bifucerating [sic] Claims Against State Farm and Granting State Farms Bill of Attorneys Fees and Costs. By Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 5/1/13.(mnfsl, )
|
|
Filing
106
ORDER. Defendant's 103 Motion to Strike Plaintiffs' Affidavit of Fact with Supporting Exhibits, Indexed, For Offers of Proof or, in the Alternative, Defendant's Reply in Support of Motion for Attorney Fees is granted in part to the extent that the court will strike Dockets Nos. 97 and 98 . Defendant 87 State Farm Fire and Casualty Company's Motion for Attorney Fees. Defendant is awarded $3,516.25 in attorney fees. By Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 4/25/13.(mnfsl, )
|
|
Filing
91
ORDER denying 89 plaintiffs' Motion to Amend to Clarify capacity of Municipal and Licensed Defendants and Interested Parties for Removal of Joint Issues and Litigation, as set forth in the order, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 4/1/2013.(mjwcd)
|
|
Filing
88
ORDER: Denying 80 plaintiffs' Motion to Set Aside Final Judgment Due to Exemption, and for Judgment on the Pleadings. Denying 81 Rule 12 Objection, Motion to Join, and Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Denying 83 Objection to Mistaken Summary Judgment Without Party Stipulation Due to Ongoing Facts. Denying 85 Bill's Affidavit in Support of Exemption, Motion to Amend and Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (to be suppressed). By Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 3/21/2013. (mjwcd)
|
|
Filing
79
FINAL JUDGMENT by Clerk, approved by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe, re: 78 Order, on 03/11/13. (nmmsl, )
|
|
Filing
78
ORDER: Denying 54 Plaintiffs' Motion to Amend Claims and Scheduling Order for Good Cause. Granting 56 Defendant State Farm Fire and Casualty Companys Motion for Summary Judgment. Denying as moot 59 Defendant's Motion for San ctions for Plaintiffs' Failure to Participate in Rule 26(f) Conference and Violation of Court's Orders. Denying as moot 64 Plaintiffs' Motion for Rule 26(c) Protective Orders. By Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 3/7/2013.(mjwcd)
|
|
Filing
77
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 03/04/13 adopting Report and Recommendations re 50 Report and Recommendations which DENIES 27 Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by Pro Se Plaintiffs. Plaintiff's objections are overru led. It is further ORDERED that the Amended Complaint filed on March 1, 2013 (Docket No. 75), is STRICKEN due to the plaintiffs failure to comply Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2) which permits such an amendment only with the opposing partys written consent or the courts leave. Plaintiffs have not shown that they have obtained defendants consent to file the Amended Complaint, nor have the plaintiffs filed a motion to file such a pleading.(nmmsl, )
|
|
Filing
68
MINUTE ORDER granting 66 Motion for Leave to File Corporate Disclosure Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 7.1. The tendered Corporate Disclosure Statement (Docket No. 66-1) is accepted for filing. By Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 02/15/13. (alvsl)
|
|
Filing
50
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Based upon these findings of fact and conclusions of law, this court RECOMMENDS that the Pro Se Plaintiffs' Motion for Temporary Injunction from Garnishment and Levy (docket no. 27 ) be DENIE D WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of jurisdiction. And ORDER denying 25 Pro Se Plaintiffs' Motion re Remand; ORDER denying 32 Pro Se Plantiffs' Motion to Strike; ORDER granting 46 Defendant's Motion to Strike; ORDERED that a Rule 16 Scheduling Conference is set before the Magistrate Judge Watanabe on February 26, 2013, at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom A-502. The proposed Rule 16 Scheduling Order shall be filed with the court five (5) days prior to the Rule 16 Scheduling Confere nce. State Farm [Defendant] shall file the proposed Rule 16 Scheduling Order electronically with the court since the Pro Se Plaintiffs are not subject to electronic filing in this court. The parties shall forthwith meet, confer, and set a date certain to meet, discuss, and complete the proposed Rule 16 Scheduling Order. By Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 01/22/13. (alvsl)
|
|
Filing
49
MINUTE ENTRY for Motion Hearing held before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 1/17/2013. It is ORDERED: Defendant State Farm Fire and Casualty Company's MOTION FOR ORDER REQUIRING PRIOR APPROVAL BEFORE ACCEPTANCE AND DOCKETING OF FILINGS BY PLAINTIFFS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a) [Docket No. 44, filed January 11, 2013] is GRANTED for reasons as set forth on the record. The Plaintiffs are not restricted from filing motions or pleadings as long as they are directly related to the pending claims in this case. FTR: L. Galera. (lag)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER TO SET SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: The parties are ordered to set an initial scheduling conference in this Court (with Judge Jackson) pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.1 no later than 45 days after the answer, motion to dismiss or other response to the complaint is filed. By Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 12/11/2012. (rbjsec. )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
