Spruel et al v. Cinemark USA, Inc.
||Chichi Spruel and Derick Spruel
||Cinemark USA, Inc.
||January 9, 2013
||Colorado District Court
||Michael E. Hegarty
||R. Brooke Jackson
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||28:1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|April 17, 2013
ORDER re 10 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; 20 Motion to Consolidate Cases: 1. The recommendation of the magistrate judge as to the seven cases as to which the recommendation was directed, for example docket #41 in case 12 cv2514, is ACCEPTED after de novo review, except as to the wrongful death claims in certain of the cases. 2. Defendants' motions to dismiss in each of the ten cases, for example docket #15 in case 12cv2514, are GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The negligence claims are dismissed with prejudice. The Premises Liability Act claims are not dismissed. To the extent wrongful death claims are derivative of liability under the Premises Liability Act, they are not dismissed. 3. Cinemark 039;s unopposed motions to consolidate the ten listed cases for purposes of discovery and motion practice consistent with the terms of this Court's scheduling order issued on November 26, 2012, for example docket #48 in case 12cv2514, are GRANTED. By Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 04/17/13. (alvsl)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.